AI DISCLOSURE: AI was used in a limited way in this assignment. I took notes while watching a 20-minute video about the U.S. Supreme Court. I then personalized those notes by adding my point of view, for example, things I found surprising or interesting about what I learned. I then used Claude AI to help me clean up the text for grammar, spelling, and punctuation. I also asked the tool to help me shape it into the form of a blog post. I then edited the text, added links, and added images and captions.
It starts with a single case. A petition, asking nine justices to act.
That's the Supreme Court in miniature — but its reach is anything but small. It stands as the most powerful governing body in the United States, legitimized by the Constitution itself. Its job: safeguard liberty, preserve the union, and uphold the law.
More than 100 justices have served throughout U.S. history, averaging 16 years each on the bench. One quote from the video sums up the rarity of the role: "Being appointed to the Supreme Court is akin to being struck by lightning."
The Court's influence didn't happen overnight. It was John Marshall who established the power to strike down laws as unconstitutional — a move that, over time, cemented respect for the Constitution itself.
Not every chapter is a triumph.
The Dred Scott decision ruled that Congress had no power to ban slavery. It took a civil war to undo that ruling, and the 14th Amendment — sometimes called the "second bill of rights" — to enshrine the correction into law.
Today, the Court accepts roughly 100 cases a year for full consideration. Each justice runs an
independent staff and reaches an independent judgment, but every petition gets the same individual scrutiny. Two questions drive the process: Was the law applied properly? And is it constitutional?
independent staff and reaches an independent judgment, but every petition gets the same individual scrutiny. Two questions drive the process: Was the law applied properly? And is it constitutional?
Before arguments even begin, the justices meet privately — nine people, shaking hands, briefly outlining the issues, each speaking once before anyone speaks twice.
As the video put it, "the inside court isn't an inside court — it's people thinking."
From there, the debate moves into public view. Two sides argue for one hour in oral argument, with the Court essentially conversing with itself through the attorneys standing before it.
In the end, the Court's authority doesn't come from force. It comes from trust — the faithfulness of the justices, and the confidence of the American people in them.

